From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Art Povelones To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:07:00 -0000 Message-id: <3.0.6.32.20010331120804.00880dd0@pove.com> References: <3AC4C0C3.6C3DD7F9@yahoo.com> <044601c0b929$91291400$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20010330110640.B12883@redhat.com> <20010330133443.A29516@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg01894.html At 01:34 PM 3/30/01 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:22:11PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>As you said it's YO and MO is that -mcygwin, -mcrtdll and -mmsvcrt makes >>even more sense. > >Except what's a "msvcrt" or a "crtdll"? They're just strings of characters. > >Expecting people to know about these DLLs or any package name other than >cygwin or (maybe) unix seems like it would still be subject to confusion. This newbie's strong "vote" or urging would be for -mcygwin, -mcrtdll and -mmsvcrt. It just makes more sense to me and this way I immediately know what I don't know. I'm also less intimidated by sets of things than inverse sets. Art Povelones -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple