On 4/7/20 12:57 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:55 +0000, JonY via Cygwin wrote:
>> On 4/6/20 10:07 AM, Jan Nijtmans via Cygwin wrote:
>>> Ping.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to release a version of mingw64-i686-binutils with the
>>> same patch as done for binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1? I suspect
>>> this would resolve the problem described here.
>>
>> Can you please report this issue to the binutils mailing list? I am
>> unfamiliar with the binutils internals to know what exactly went wrong.
> 
> JonY,
> 
> I think the relevant differences after 2.34 were PR24511 and PR25447,
> which are already fixed upstream:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=40bfb9762747f8336b17c70a0173d10200fa62eb
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=82f439d028c65663a0baf0a17ef5c4a2ea5c84a7
> 
> Adding those as patches to 2.34 should fix the issue without having to
> resort to a git snapshot.
> 

OK, I'll see about using those 2 patches over the weekends.