From: Houder <houder@xs4all.nl>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? SURPRISE!
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <353243559c68bf1200675e2dc13c3d93@smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28f7eeae-ed40-9837-53bc-d2d6a33ad5a7@gmail.com>
On Wed, 31 May 2017 09:27:02, cyg Simple wrote:
[snip]
> All of this talk of /etc/passwd leads me to point you to
> https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html.
cyg,
Do you want me to study that text a second, third, fourth or Xth time ...?
However, let me take another angle now ...
Active Directory is just Microsoft's version of the 'network database', a way
to keep housekeeping in a centralized manner (like NIS).
Agreed?
Anyone out there, who uses AD, in stead of /etc/{passwd,group}, and observes
that the grandchild of the listener is executed by user "sshd"?
Anyone out there, who uses AD, in stead of /etc/{passwd,group}, and is brave
enough to delete the sshd account? Is ssh still working?
Now you might say that I am "a bit aggressive" above (yes, I _do_ feel a bit
peevish). However I would like to see arguments that stick and/or proof that
shows me wrong.
Larry Hall replied with an argument, you did not (neither did Andrey Repin).
Regards,
Henri
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-29 6:40 openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? Houder
2017-05-29 9:22 ` Marco Atzeri
2017-05-29 11:39 ` Houder
2017-05-29 11:44 ` openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? -- example only Houder
2017-05-29 14:29 ` openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? Houder
2017-05-29 17:45 ` openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? SURPRISE! Houder
2017-05-29 20:30 ` Andrey Repin
2017-05-30 3:49 ` Houder
2017-05-30 16:16 ` Houder
2017-05-31 4:58 ` Larry Hall (Cygwin)
2017-05-31 10:51 ` Houder
2017-05-31 14:46 ` cyg Simple
2017-05-31 14:57 ` Houder [this message]
2017-05-31 14:59 ` openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? SURPRISE! -- minor correction Houder
2017-05-31 16:34 ` openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? SURPRISE! cyg Simple
2017-05-31 19:52 ` Houder
2017-05-31 20:16 ` cyg Simple
2017-06-01 2:27 ` Larry Hall (Cygwin)
2017-05-31 20:20 ` openssh: privilege separation no longer supported on Cygwin? Marco Atzeri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=353243559c68bf1200675e2dc13c3d93@smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net \
--to=houder@xs4all.nl \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).