From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17742 invoked by alias); 11 May 2016 16:11:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 17718 invoked by uid 89); 11 May 2016 16:10:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Bonnet, bonnet, borrow, 0992 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 May 2016 16:10:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6A946212 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 16:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lanikai.local (vpn-235-116.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.235.116]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4BGAsQc025125 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 12:10:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <6da62132-1e66-41c9-043d-c552f4faf1c3@redhat.com> <4f86f77b-e2cb-b654-760b-499623dd61a1@cygwin.com> From: Mike Bonnet Message-ID: <360d98a0-8e44-e816-ea44-d87a2e2655a4@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:11:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4f86f77b-e2cb-b654-760b-499623dd61a1@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote: >> I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large >> directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012. > > But not with 0.99? Have you been able to reproduce this on any other > systems? Only saw it with 0.99.1. Yes, saw it on several systems, all running 0.99.1. >> In the past > > When? This was several years ago. >> this happened when some 32-bit files were in the source tree >> when the 64-bit version was built. It's possible this happened again. > > Extremely unlikely. cygport makes 32-bit and 64-bit builds in their own > directories. > >> Any chance we could get a new 64-bit build? > > We'd need to find the real cause of this before it would be of any help. > I'd start with updating to 0.99.2, however we borrow Fedora's -norar > sources but they haven't bumped yet (#1333949). I'll retry with 0.99.2 when it's available. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple