From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.138]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C153385703F for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:37:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6C153385703F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian.inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([24.64.172.44]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id ClsGkOyKqYYpxClsHkihRy; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:37:38 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=OubUNx3t c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=JZeu4sPTHj9YQVegERsA:9 a=OrKukjJuGKQAEbez:21 a=EucA_seSsW5LsgEy:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cpp /usr/include/threads.h fails; modfl segfaults To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <02b16d2e-9d51-de58-807b-3b31b2565b59.ref@aol.com> <02b16d2e-9d51-de58-807b-3b31b2565b59@aol.com> <20200830130005.GR3272@calimero.vinschen.de> <20200831073500.GU3272@calimero.vinschen.de> From: Brian Inglis Autocrypt: addr=Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXopx8xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnCK0qv/xwUCCZQoA9BHRYpstERrspfT0NkUWQVuoePa0 LkJyaWFuIEluZ2xpcyA8QnJpYW4uSW5nbGlzQFN5c3RlbWF0aWNTdy5hYi5jYT6IlgQTFggA PhYhBMM5/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsDBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEB62lxu92I8Y0ioBAI8xrggNxziAVmr+Xm6nnyjoujMqWcq3oEhlYGAO WacZAQDFtdDx2koSVSoOmfaOyRTbIWSf9/Cjai29060fsmdsDLg4BF6KcfMSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0Awv8kHI2PaEgViDqzbnoe8B9KMHoBZLS92HdC7ZPh8HQMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMM5 /lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEB62lxu92I8YZwUBAJw/74rF IyaSsGI7ewCdCy88Lce/kdwX7zGwid+f8NZ3AQC/ezTFFi5obXnyMxZJN464nPXiggtT9gN5 RSyTY8X+AQ== Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: <36f6cc1b-1944-f1b6-b832-33205c08bbae@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:37:36 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200831073500.GU3272@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGhhNBQsYe8QTh0U2fpW5yPTLKeRZAfxsiVNzD4vZSnt9QUiUFY4TwtoiuSJIrUVy6vdxgSuKcoDzXuBQ1foH/DmlVjsC0tcYESb+GvozbQzjLmatouT 16Hp15AGU+Z9GPac19+WO/gsL8sjNEWed44mMXGhsrX2wkhUoO2X5e9mBDNe2xtSA/1DLd3nEQGy5A== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:37:40 -0000 On 2020-08-31 01:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 30 14:39, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2020-08-30 07:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Aug 29 08:52, airplanemath via Cygwin wrote: >>>> I have two reports.  A brief description of the system: >>>> $ uname -a | sed "s/${HOSTNAME}/\${HOSTNAME}/g" >>>> CYGWIN_NT-10.0 ${HOSTNAME} 3.1.7(0.340/5/3) 2020-08-22 17:48 x86_64 Cygwin >> ... >>>> $ cat test.c >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> >>>> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { >>>>   long double a, b, c; >>>>   char *num_end = NULL; >>>>   a = b = c = 0.0L; >>>>   if (argc != 2) { >>>>     fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s NUMBER\n", argv[0]); >>>>     exit(1); >>>>   } >>>>   a = strtold(argv[1], &num_end); >>>>   b = modfl(a, &c); >>>>   printf("%Lf %Lf %Lf\n", a, b, c); >>>>   return 0; >>>> } >>> >>> This is a bug in the assembler code taken from Mingw-w64. The bug has >>> been fixed upstream, so I just pulled in the upstream fixes. >> >> The 64 bit fix doesn't pop eax but *now* flags eax as clobbered, whereas the 32 >> bit fix both pops and *now* flags eax as clobbered, which it really doesn't need >> to do. Is this inconsistent treatment correct? > > You may be right that this is not necessary on i686, but it doesn't > hurt either and I'd like to stick to the upstream code if possible. The upstream patch changed only amd64/x86_64 code sequences for multiple modules including modfl, and left i386/x86 untouched for those modules. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in IEC units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]