public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm@sigma6.com>
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
Cc: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml@is.lg.ua>, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer  0.3.0 released
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 16:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38CD856B.BCF415C2@sigma6.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000313181326.00b8a590@pop.ma.ultranet.com>

Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> Personally, I think posting comparative data is useful to this list...

So do I.  If it mentions Cygwin, it's relevant... if it doesn't mention
Cygwin, it's not appropriate for this list... at least that's what
others seem to be saying, and I tend to agree.

Speaking for myself... I don't mind the occaisional off-topic
announcement, but there is always a danger that they can snowball into a
long non-relevant discussion thread, subverting the real purpose of this
list.  I've seen it happen elsewhere.

--
Jeff Sturm
jsturm@sigma6.com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-03-13 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-13 10:04 Earnie Boyd
2000-03-13 11:21 ` Re[2]: " Paul Sokolovsky
2000-03-13 15:16   ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2000-03-13 15:56     ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-13 16:23       ` Jeff Sturm
2000-03-13 18:08         ` Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...) Geoffrey Noer
2000-03-14 16:29           ` Scott Blachowicz
2000-03-14 21:04             ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-15  0:05             ` Re[2]: " Egor Duda
2000-03-13 16:13     ` Jeff Sturm [this message]
2000-03-13 16:17       ` [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Chris Faylor
2000-03-13 15:01 ` Re[2]: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 r Michael Hirmke
     [not found] <;>
     [not found] ` <from>
     [not found]   ` <on>
1997-03-24 10:32     ` Windows API calls that don't work? (Was RE: Stupid stupi David W Palmer
     [not found]       ` <Mar>
     [not found]         ` <13,>
     [not found]           ` <2000>
     [not found]             ` <at>
     [not found]               ` <11:56:00PM>
     [not found]                 ` <+0200>
2000-03-13 15:34                   ` [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Michael Hirmke
2000-03-13 15:52                     ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-14 13:06                       ` Michael Hirmke
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-13  5:16 Paul Sokolovsky
2000-03-13  8:05 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-13  9:03   ` Dr. Volker Zell
2000-03-13 15:01   ` Michael Hirmke
2000-03-13 15:05     ` Chris Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38CD856B.BCF415C2@sigma6.com \
    --to=jsturm@sigma6.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=lhall@rfk.com \
    --cc=paul-ml@is.lg.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).