From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Wilson To: Charles Wilson Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Robert Collins , cygwin@Cygwin.Com, Bernard Dautrevaux , 'Tim Van Holder' , automake@gnu.org Subject: Re: Automake 1.4l released Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 20:16:00 -0000 Message-id: <3B7B3AFD.7010704@ece.gatech.edu> References: <3B7974C6.83934084@yahoo.com> <3B797B22.C06C71D9@yahoo.com> <87bslip7hj.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20010814195923.A28367@redhat.com> <87wv46uoac.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <997839007.16944.3.camel@robertlinux> <3B79DED8.3040807@ece.gatech.edu> <87snes4u2y.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3B7B2B5F.4070703@ece.gatech.edu> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00718.html For what it's worth, I have now been able to test a recent change to cygwin;s utime() implementation. After building & installing a new cygwin kernel with that change, I then built a new automake from "clean" automake-1.4l sources. (that is, no local diffs). It passed the three pesky tests lex3, pr9, and pr87. Therefore, today's change to cygwin's utime() successfully works around window's brokenness, with the following conditions: 1) running on NT or W2K 2) using NTFS 3) CYGWIN variable contains the 'ntsec' flag I'm now going to go run the whole automake testsuite and make sure there are no regressions... --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/