From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3807 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 00:34:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 3778 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2002 00:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO katrina.ibb.gatech.edu) (128.61.131.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2002 00:34:30 -0000 Received: from ece.gatech.edu (ibb-512.ibb.gatech.edu [128.61.133.162]) by katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0B0YM419683; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:34:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C3E328B.4080403@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:34:00 -0000 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Leichter CC: earnie_boyd@yahoo.com, hschwentner@yahoo.com, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Compiling apps to Mingw32 with cygwin References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00690.txt.bz2 Jon Leichter wrote: > It's true that I don't usually patch the script myself and send it back. In > some cases, there isn't any organization to send the patches back to, e.g. > GDBM. This is not an unsubstaniated statement. I sent patches to GDBM years > ago, and nothing ever came of it. What patches? Do they affect functionality, or just the build process? If and aren't interested, we can at least add them to cygwin's gdbm if they provide important bugfixes... --Chuck cygwin gdbm maintainer -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/