From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3259 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2002 17:51:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 3252 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 17:51:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 17:51:12 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SLbc-0007tt-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:50:24 +0200 To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SLbc-0007tl-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:50:24 +0200 Path: not-for-mail From: Charles Wilson Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin Subject: Re: Charles: Fwd: Re: NDBM & ODBM on Cygwin? Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3D2C7418.9090704@ece.gatech.edu> References: <45100201091.20020630142110@familiehaase.de> <149122724768.20020630203633@familiehaase.de> <40296037229.20020710073025@familiehaase.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: ibb-407.ibb.gatech.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026323424 30364 128.61.133.57 (10 Jul 2002 17:50:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:50:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00845.txt.bz2 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Charles, > > Jarkko removed NDBM_File & ODBM_File from Cygwin builds. > What do you think, should I try to reinclude them? Is > it doing s.th. useful I'm not aware of? I cannot remember > the reason why it was removed. I'll try to figure out > after I know if I should reinclude it. > Someone else needs ODBM_File or NDBM_File in future? It's a core feature of perl -- so if possible we should supply it. Why did Jarkko remove it? Merely because of the one test failure? I think the problem with ndbm is that he's using a FAT file system; gdbm's emulation of NDBM doesn't work on FAT -- but it's fine on NTFS. --Chuck > To be exact: NDBM_File & ODBM_File. I got all tests passing, just one > test failing with NDBM_File & ODBM_File: > Failed 2/709 test scripts, 99.72% okay. 6/65198 subtests failed, 99.99% okay. > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > .../lib/Memoize/t/tie_ndbm.t 13 3328 4 4 100.00% 1-4 > op/alarm.t 4 2 50.00% 1-2 > 46 tests and 307 subtests skipped. > > where tie_ndbm.t fails with this: > .../lib/Memoize/t/tie_ndbm..............Permission denied at ../lib/Memoize/t/tie_ndbm.t line 51. > dubious > Test returned status 13 (wstat 3328, 0xd00) > DIED. FAILED tests 1-4 > > >>What is wrong with libgdbm as base for NDBM & ODBM, why are they no >>longer build for Perl on Cygwin? >> -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/