From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30796 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2003 05:11:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 30788 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 05:11:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO grouse.mail.pas.earthlink.net) (207.217.120.116) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2003 05:11:35 -0000 Received: from user-12hcoqr.cable.mindspring.com ([69.22.99.91] helo=cwilson.fastmail.fm) by grouse.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19yPAc-0005vw-00; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:11:35 -0700 Message-ID: <3F63F7F4.9090602@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 05:11:00 -0000 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: (link to) gcc-testsuite results for cygming-special 3.3.1 References: <200309140048.h8E0mCaA166446@pimout4-ext.prodigy.net> <20030914005217.GA11423@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030914005217.GA11423@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00862.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 05:48:11PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote: > >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-09/msg00497.html > > > Are you saying that you'd like to be the package maintainer for this? > That would be great! Snarkiness aside, Oh Magnate of Meanness, but I believe Tim was giving you precisely what you asked for. You said the packages (gcc-3.3.1-1 and gcc-mingw-20030911-1) were available for testing. Tim ran the testsuite, today, 13 Sep 2003. And then reported the results. He also reported them to the gcc-testresults mailing list -- but only sent "us" a link to that earlier report. Some more words from Tim would've been nice -- and keeping the response in your original thread instead of starting a new one wouldn't've hurt, either. But I really really hope you haven't invented a new rule where: "please test" "okay, here's my results" "great, thanks for volunteering to take over maint of the package" 'cause that'd really cut down on the number of people who bother to read 'Avail for test' messages... -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/