From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.138]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14CF3861027 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 17:07:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D14CF3861027 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian.inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([68.147.0.90]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id HUyIlYQCUHmS3HUyJlHKhI; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:07:39 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MaypB7zf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=603fc25b a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=zW6PS2oUAAAA:8 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=uYT-Tk0qkVT609LjNaIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=vEvtpiLwS78ZTq96Anqb:22 a=sRI3_1zDfAgwuvI8zelB:22 Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <65851a08-a0d3-4fca-a956-77cf73459180@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <24934718098a4d26a65b68ef62f3b46e@BELBRU-EXMP101.eeas.europa.eu> <4125b749-86de-ae02-43d9-16ff5a8565cd@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <0d21a331911b4733a5e638a7c72d7ee2@BELBRU-EXMP101.eeas.europa.eu> <82bf0b29-24d6-8165-0b79-b47dddc31035@towo.net> <081d56bc357b4a3a88206cd20e98520a@BELBRU-EXMP101.eeas.europa.eu> <1437def7e3614a118a42aaefcb3262ae@BELBRU-EXMP101.eeas.europa.eu> From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software Subject: Re: Home directory was not created Message-ID: <3bb73ce7-0fca-be99-c937-6fdc860c154b@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:07:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1437def7e3614a118a42aaefcb3262ae@BELBRU-EXMP101.eeas.europa.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfPG1isPbcEyUs3Jmen7zPpoxstj9OF+cVY15CNzEAT1dNv9JEQGi4Z9MqTHrk6vt+ZyFBsZxWOoXQ05P94HqttvQINPFc6qIESGd41yJeDVIMtjPz69P XTKRycY5IhtV8CRuKI+DoHzcvwH+XqDmA4SjrjJUH8HrGfClUaVOOMM7B1THwUB/craEf36B/Dn6oXymI8FSJbAB7Xguhlr79kY= X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:07:42 -0000 On 2021-03-03 06:07, KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT) wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thomas Wolff >> Sent: 03 March 2021 13:59 >> >> Am 03.03.2021 um 13:43 schrieb KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT): >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Thomas Wolff >>>> Sent: 03 March 2021 12:58 >>>> >>>> Am 03.03.2021 um 12:22 schrieb KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT): >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Cygwin On Behalf Of Brian Inglis >>>>>> Sent: 02 March 2021 19:57 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2021-03-02 01:08, KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT) wrote: >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT) >>>>>>> Sent: 02 March 2021 08:15 >>>>>>> zip 358KB > 256KB too big I think >>>>> OK, the mystery has been resolved. There should be at least an >>>>> e-mail >>>> notification to indicate that limitation. It is not polite for the >>>> list to simply ignore the submissions without saying anything :) >>>> There have been 3 responses on the list so what are you complaining >> about? >>> I couldn't send the log file "setup.log.full" as attachment to the list. I tried >> both plain and zip version to no avail. >>> >>> I have manage to sent it only as a private e-mail to Brian. There was no e- >> mail returned to indicate any error. It was silently ignored whereas there >> should be an error notification, or if there was it never reached my mailbox. >> You seem to have a novice understanding of how many open source projects >> and mailing lists work. >> You cannot *expect* anybody to respond to you within a certain time, or >> even less than a day, unless you had a paid service contract. So reduce your >> expectations. This is a volunteer project, free for all users after all. > > I am sorry Thomas for not being clear. I didn't get any automated error > response for my rejected e-mail with the attachment to the list. That was my > complain about. In no case, there was no complain about the responses on the > issue from the list members. I apologise for the misunderstanding. Don't expect mailing lists that don't post emails for policy reasons to reply because of HTML, size, etc. That mail bombs a third party if the return address is spoofed. At one point corporate boilerplate with certain keywords caused drops. If a post does not appear on the list, you check the list, notice, and mention that, with stats, in a post and you will be enlightened. ;^> It would be nice to document the size limit on the Cygwin ML web page. I can provide a patch, if someone provides an attachment size limit? If not, I can provide a patch, and have someone fill in the actual size limit. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]