From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
To: David Starks-Browning <starksb@ebi.ac.uk>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 08:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.1.2.20020301110418.0243f488@pop.ma.ultranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7840-Fri01Mar2002125942+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
At 07:59 AM 3/1/2002, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Thursday 28 Feb 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> > David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this
> > FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
> > the then released versions of Windows?
>
>Larry,
>
>I don't understand what's wrong with the current FAQ entry. Maybe I
>misunderstand the question?
>
>Thanks,
>David
Hi David,
Perhaps. It's an esoteric one. The original poster of this question wanted
to know if Cygwin 1.3.2 would work with Win2000. I replied with the FAQ
entry that says Cygwin works with 9x/Me/NT/W2K/XP. The reply I got back
from the poster then was that he had seen this entry but thought it
referenced only the current Cygwin DLL (1.3.9 at that point). So the only
question I was raising was whether you think it would be more or less
confusing to people to add some wording to the FAQ entry that specifies
that any recent Cygwin DLL works with Windows, not just the latest.
It's not clear to me that this additional wording wouldn't raise more
questions than it answers. Judging by your response, I think leaving things
as is may be the best option. What do you think?
Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-01 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <570DA4A1BC7DD4119AD7000629551498013E10E1@pjmnt11.pjm.com>
2002-02-28 17:00 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-03-01 5:00 ` David Starks-Browning
2002-03-01 8:19 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [this message]
2002-03-03 0:54 ` David Starks-Browning
2002-03-04 7:26 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-02-28 14:50 jonesr
2002-02-28 16:03 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.3.1.2.20020301110418.0243f488@pop.ma.ultranet.com \
--to=lhall@rfk.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=starksb@ebi.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).