* RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
[not found] <570DA4A1BC7DD4119AD7000629551498013E10E1@pjmnt11.pjm.com>
@ 2002-02-28 17:00 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-03-01 5:00 ` David Starks-Browning
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) @ 2002-02-28 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jonesr; +Cc: cygwin
Yes. The Cywgin DLL has always gone to great lengths to support all released
versions of Windows, other than CE. Other than the obvious caveats noted in
the FAQ entry which I referred you to, it's safe to assume nothing more or
less. Historically, the Cygwin DLL has 'worked' with whatever Windows
versions were current at the time. This has certainly been true for the
last 5+ years conservatively. No need to fret.
It's worth noting, however, that this list only really "supports" the
current release of Cygwin. So if you have an issue with 1.3.2 that you
want to post, the response you're likely to get is 'does it work with
1.3.10?'
David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this
FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
the then released versions of Windows?
Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
At 05:31 PM 2/28/2002, jonesr@pjm.com wrote:
>I did prior to my e-mail & interpreted to mean applicability to the 1.3.9 DLL.
>Can I presume that FAQ item applies to all DLL versions, just to 1.3.9, or to
>the 1.3.* family?
>
>Bob J.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall@rfk.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:21 PM
>To: jonesr@pjm.com; cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
>
>
>At 05:20 PM 2/28/2002, jonesr@pjm.com wrote:
>
>
> >Bob Jones
> >Decision Support Analyst
> >Settlements, Planning, & Corporate Services Dept.
> >PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
> >(610) 666-8954
> >jonesr@pjm.com
> >
> >"Omnia apud me mathematica fiunt."
> >(With me everything turns into mathematics.)
> >-- Rene Descartes
>
>
>Look to the FAQ for these kinds of questions:
>
>What versions of Windows are supported?
>http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_1.html#SEC2
>
>
>Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
>RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
>838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
>Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
2002-02-28 17:00 ` Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible? Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
@ 2002-03-01 5:00 ` David Starks-Browning
2002-03-01 8:19 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Starks-Browning @ 2002-03-01 5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Thursday 28 Feb 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this
> FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
> the then released versions of Windows?
Larry,
I don't understand what's wrong with the current FAQ entry. Maybe I
misunderstand the question?
Thanks,
David
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
2002-03-01 5:00 ` David Starks-Browning
@ 2002-03-01 8:19 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-03-03 0:54 ` David Starks-Browning
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) @ 2002-03-01 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Starks-Browning, cygwin
At 07:59 AM 3/1/2002, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Thursday 28 Feb 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> > David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this
> > FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
> > the then released versions of Windows?
>
>Larry,
>
>I don't understand what's wrong with the current FAQ entry. Maybe I
>misunderstand the question?
>
>Thanks,
>David
Hi David,
Perhaps. It's an esoteric one. The original poster of this question wanted
to know if Cygwin 1.3.2 would work with Win2000. I replied with the FAQ
entry that says Cygwin works with 9x/Me/NT/W2K/XP. The reply I got back
from the poster then was that he had seen this entry but thought it
referenced only the current Cygwin DLL (1.3.9 at that point). So the only
question I was raising was whether you think it would be more or less
confusing to people to add some wording to the FAQ entry that specifies
that any recent Cygwin DLL works with Windows, not just the latest.
It's not clear to me that this additional wording wouldn't raise more
questions than it answers. Judging by your response, I think leaving things
as is may be the best option. What do you think?
Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
2002-03-01 8:19 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
@ 2002-03-03 0:54 ` David Starks-Browning
2002-03-04 7:26 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Starks-Browning @ 2002-03-03 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Friday 1 Mar 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> Perhaps. It's an esoteric one. The original poster of this question wanted
> to know if Cygwin 1.3.2 would work with Win2000. I replied with the FAQ
> entry that says Cygwin works with 9x/Me/NT/W2K/XP. The reply I got back
> from the poster then was that he had seen this entry but thought it
> referenced only the current Cygwin DLL (1.3.9 at that point). So the only
> question I was raising was whether you think it would be more or less
> confusing to people to add some wording to the FAQ entry that specifies
> that any recent Cygwin DLL works with Windows, not just the latest.
> It's not clear to me that this additional wording wouldn't raise more
> questions than it answers. Judging by your response, I think leaving things
> as is may be the best option. What do you think?
I think it's best to leave this entry as it is.
Thanks,
David
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
2002-03-03 0:54 ` David Starks-Browning
@ 2002-03-04 7:26 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) @ 2002-03-04 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Starks-Browning, cygwin
At 03:54 AM 3/3/2002, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Friday 1 Mar 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> > Perhaps. It's an esoteric one. The original poster of this question wanted
> > to know if Cygwin 1.3.2 would work with Win2000. I replied with the FAQ
> > entry that says Cygwin works with 9x/Me/NT/W2K/XP. The reply I got back
> > from the poster then was that he had seen this entry but thought it
> > referenced only the current Cygwin DLL (1.3.9 at that point). So the only
> > question I was raising was whether you think it would be more or less
> > confusing to people to add some wording to the FAQ entry that specifies
> > that any recent Cygwin DLL works with Windows, not just the latest.
> > It's not clear to me that this additional wording wouldn't raise more
> > questions than it answers. Judging by your response, I think leaving things
> > as is may be the best option. What do you think?
>
>I think it's best to leave this entry as it is.
Very good. Thanks for the 'ruling'. :-)
Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
2002-02-28 14:50 jonesr
@ 2002-02-28 16:03 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) @ 2002-02-28 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jonesr, cygwin
At 05:20 PM 2/28/2002, jonesr@pjm.com wrote:
>Bob Jones
>Decision Support Analyst
>Settlements, Planning, & Corporate Services Dept.
>PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
>(610) 666-8954
>jonesr@pjm.com
>
>"Omnia apud me mathematica fiunt."
>(With me everything turns into mathematics.)
>-- Rene Descartes
Look to the FAQ for these kinds of questions:
What versions of Windows are supported?
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_1.html#SEC2
Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
@ 2002-02-28 14:50 jonesr
2002-02-28 16:03 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: jonesr @ 2002-02-28 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Bob Jones
Decision Support Analyst
Settlements, Planning, & Corporate Services Dept.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
(610) 666-8954
jonesr@pjm.com
"Omnia apud me mathematica fiunt."
(With me everything turns into mathematics.)
-- Rene Descartes
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-04 15:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <570DA4A1BC7DD4119AD7000629551498013E10E1@pjmnt11.pjm.com>
2002-02-28 17:00 ` Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible? Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-03-01 5:00 ` David Starks-Browning
2002-03-01 8:19 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-03-03 0:54 ` David Starks-Browning
2002-03-04 7:26 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2002-02-28 14:50 jonesr
2002-02-28 16:03 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).