From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28037 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2002 16:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 27947 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2002 16:25:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ligarius-fe0.ultra.net) (146.115.8.189) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2002 16:25:18 -0000 Received: from enterprise-e.rfk.com (207-172-102-239.s1001.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.102.239]) by ligarius-fe0.ultra.net (8.8.8/ult/n26500/mtc.v2) with ESMTP id LAA07459; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 11:22:44 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020304111633.0248ca40@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall@pop.ma.ultranet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 08:25:00 -0000 To: "Edward Lam" , cygwin@cygwin.com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: IA64 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 At 12:17 AM 3/4/2002, Edward Lam wrote: >Hi, > >Has anyone ported cygwin to the IA64 yet? > >Thanks, >-Edward >(Please cc my e-mail as I won't be able to regular check messages here) This kind of information is in the list archives but from my recollection the answer, whenever this question is asked, seems to be a resounding "no", or at least that's the way I interpret the deafening silence. Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/