From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28650 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2002 14:11:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 28586 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2002 14:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ligarius-fe0.ultra.net) (146.115.8.189) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2002 14:11:31 -0000 Received: from enterprise-e.rfk.com (216-164-248-80.s3064.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com [216.164.248.80]) by ligarius-fe0.ultra.net (8.8.8/ult/n26500/mtc.v2) with ESMTP id KAA00580; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:11:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020417094720.057f2498@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall@pop.ma.ultranet.com Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:12:00 -0000 To: "Max Bowsher" , From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Setup's download directory structure - was Re: An deeper and not before asked question about setup.exe In-Reply-To: <003101c1e58a$a4595510$5400a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> References: <001a01c1e50a$3aa01d50$770110ac@caeschmitt.de> <123480150.20020416102617@syntrex.com> <4.3.1.2.20020416110745.0575fe10@pop.ma.ultranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00887.txt.bz2 At 05:06 PM 4/16/2002, Max Bowsher wrote: > > Please don't take this the wrong way but why do you care? >No, that's ok. Here is why: > >I need to maintain my local package directory to remove old versions. Having the >packages scattered between mirror directories is unhelpful. Therefore, I use a >modified version of the clean_setup.pl that was posted here a while ago. I do >not understand, and could not find in the archives, a reason for using these >directories at all. If there is a reason, then sorry for the list noise, if not, >I would suggest the folder layout be reconsidered. OK, I understand why you're asking what you're asking. Here are the salient points that help answer your question (from memory based on previous list discussions on this subject): 1. The current structure supports multiple site downloads with 1 invocation of setup. This helps mitigate mirror site latency problems when updated or new packages are released. 2. The actual naming of the new download directory is standard's based, though I don't remember the specifics here. It's not clear that you have any objection to this naming but I thought I'd mention it since it seems pertinent. 3. The form of setup's download directory is not and won't remain static. It will change as setup's needs change. If you plan to try to maintain the download directory with some external script of your own choosing, you will need to maintain that script through these changes. In summary, there are no plans to make the download directory a static form. And although there has been some discussion about collapsing the multiple directories into one, there's no guarantee that this structure will match that which you are used to, even if it does happen. HTH, Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/