From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26791 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2019 17:39:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 26761 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2019 17:39:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*u:en-US, H*UA:en-US, H*u:5.1, H*r:192.168.10 X-HELO: mail-ot1-f44.google.com Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (HELO mail-ot1-f44.google.com) (209.85.210.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:39:04 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id s20so20785874otp.4 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:39:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9mAfU1rGxaOYM+O3pr+kTF/3pf6KR3+jOuHPVvXO8nI=; b=gU42Xo/53OVouZfk4hq8bqtkErWfCDUwPDxfCJLyvS8ADyjotSAD2N69O2ZCAWD5xa al2FZm8A8bEbxMkRgFjKPb2VSdjGTJYizQBYhrEsc+M6b1eok3I9VkNqmxsEq5kGHPn+ qNTHSPweIXzGUESXJBhEbGaWbLSYSERcvyPTD/u9b71KxaY9MxIXgnPmaNXVMHNUCmYZ MkTN/SkS3FdLVJnRBwkaCH1KBH8LC8fCWHEou5XpKgIgNodrk1JR0mA81XsysUf2LNfg x+bYns0SeiO4K2rey17M4BXBeYoaKNrzntv7WrnRJlEzO62ecrsl5iO5JwIWmhA8aOms vXAQ== Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.10.5] ([200.57.195.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e24sm7241493otp.14.2019.07.09.10.39.02 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Question about the ldd output To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=c3=a9_Berber?= Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <40138a18-4360-cd52-9eb9-7c32838ea9c8@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 On 7/9/2019 11:40 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: > Libraries may be loaded asynchronously as they are accessed, and ldd just dumps > the dll import table once the subprocess is ready to run. > Perhaps these are import entries that ldd should detect and skip or annotate in > some more useful way. True, its just the way Windows works, some libraries are dynamically loaded, some may not exist, and are not needed. Try the view from SysInternals' Dependency Walker (which now seems to be named ListDLLs, or maybe was added to ProcessExplorer), shows the same thing (if the Windows PATH is set to include Cygwin's libraries), with lots of interrogation signs... except that it also shows exactly which dll is "missing". -- R.Berber -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple