From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6641 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2004 05:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6509 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2004 05:10:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2004 05:10:20 -0000 Received: from cwilson.fastmail.fm (user-12hcoqr.cable.mindspring.com [69.22.99.91]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEBC5AFFF3; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:09:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4036E874.9030708@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:23:00 -0000 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040120 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: zip with encryption References: <200402202134.i1KLYBcC022320@kafka.net.nih.gov> In-Reply-To: <200402202134.i1KLYBcC022320@kafka.net.nih.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg01152.txt.bz2 bbuchbinder wrote: > I was wondering if it might be possible to have zip 2.3 re-compiled > with encryption and re-released. Chuck Wilson stated in > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2001/msg00005.html > and > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2002-05/msg00018.html > that it can be done but that first Red Hat needs to inform the U.S. > government that binaries with encryption will be exported. I know > that there are other ways to get encrypted zip files but it would > be convenient if the official Cygwin zip would be encryption-enabled. Also, I'm not sure what the implications are for our mirroring hosts. Does the law require them to also notify the US govt, simply because they mirror what sourceware's server provides? Surely the kernel mirrors have dealt with this issue; perhaps only the "primary source" needs to make the notification. I don't know. I'm not a lawyer so I don't even WANT to know. But it's Yet Another Thing RH's lawyers would have to look into, just for little old me to include encryption code in cygwin's port of the zip package. Not likely to happen -- especially with Red Hat's current legal issues taking up all the lawyering time. SCO, XFree86 licensing GPL incompatibilities, etc etc etc -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/