are rand48() & Co implemented now?

are rand48() & Co implemented now?

[electa]

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now?

[Corinna Vinschen]

Yes.

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Co-Project Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now?

[electa]

i have used
#include <stdlib.h>
but gcc still prints
"implicit declaration of function lrand48()",
and "srand48()".


"Corinna Vinschen" <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:20040503135454.GH2201@cygbert.vinschen.de...
> Yes.
>
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Co-Project Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now?

[Larry Hall]

At 10:41 AM 5/3/2004, you wrote:
>i have used
>#include <stdlib.h>
>but gcc still prints
>"implicit declaration of function lrand48()",
>and "srand48()".


Sorry, I can't reproduce that behavior.  See:

>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html


The information requested at the URL above plus sample source should help 
clarify where your problem is.


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now?

[chris jefferson]

electa wrote:

>i have used
>#include <stdlib.h>
>but gcc still prints
>"implicit declaration of function lrand48()",
>and "srand48()".
>
>
>  
>
Just checking, are you using the "-mno-cygwin" flag on gcc/g++? This 
would cause that error. If so, then you are using mingw and should 
really go and ask them why it doesn't work (and I suspect they'll tell 
you it is because it's not in the standard windows c library).


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/