From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18554 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2008 04:54:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 18546 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Dec 2008 04:54:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,TVD_SPACED_SUBJECT_WORD3 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ns2.prospeed.net (HELO mail.prospeed.net) (64.25.80.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:53:23 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (lhall.prospeed.net [64.25.83.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.prospeed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1871D28017321 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:53:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <495AFA99.3080705@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:54:00 -0000 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081120 Remi/2.0.0.18-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: MinTTY References: <495917BA.1090401@gmail.com> <0E77A4429F494644A9C7CB6F6F3D2125@DFW5RB41> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A211B41DD8@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> <20081230165106.GA5230@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <495AF5CC.7040903@etr-usa.com> In-Reply-To: <495AF5CC.7040903@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00685.txt.bz2 Warren Young wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> I don't really feel comfortable having >> another ssh implementation in Cygwin. > > wget, curl > lftp, ncftp > links, lynx > GraphicsMagic, ImageMagick > ash, bash, tcsh, zsh, scsh, pdksh, posh > vim, nano, emacs, joe, xemacs, nedit, xedit, gvim > > ....need I go on? > > Not that I'm pushing for including a puttycyg package. You'll just need > a better justification than that to keep it out. What do any of the programs you've listed have to do with ssh? Certainly none of these that comprise Cygwin packages have a ssh implementation of their own as part of the package. Since this is what Chris was voicing concern about, I don't see that any of utilities you listed above would fall into the same category. I guess you'll have to try harder. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/