From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29414 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2010 17:37:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29387 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2010 17:37:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pv0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-pv0-f171.google.com) (74.125.83.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:37:27 +0000 Received: by pvh11 with SMTP id 11so1288987pvh.2 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.20.13 with SMTP id x13mr3548609wfi.285.1270661845672; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u34sm2346919wfh.8.2010.04.07.10.37.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBCC73A.1010501@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:37:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn Reply-To: Thread TITTTL'd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: [OT] Re: installer improvements References: <4BBB2836.3000601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On 07/04/2010 13:18, wefwef wefwef wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Morgan Gangwere wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:10 AM, wefwef wefwef wrote: >>>>> After using cygwin for years, and having some recent difficulty >>>>> installing, I took a look at the installer to actually try and >>>>> understand it (a novel concept I know!). >> Your problem was that a package didnt get installed because you would >> have had to explicitly told it not to have been. > > Nice expla[KERSNIPFLUSHSPLAT] Since this debate is heading OT, I posted my response to the -talk list: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2010-q2/msg00002.html cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple