From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17485 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2010 14:19:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17475 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2010 14:19:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.sidefx.com (HELO mail.sidefx.com) (38.99.137.163) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:18:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4C7D0F3F.4050700@sidefx.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:12:00 -0000 From: Edward Lam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0b5pre) Gecko/20100820 Shredder/3.2a1pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems References: <4C7CA209.60603@onevision.de> <20100831140842.GA11833@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20100831140842.GA11833@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg01002.txt.bz2 On 8/31/2010 10:08 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Here's what I'm saying: It makes absolutely no sense that moving the > call would have any effect. The code is the way it is for a reason > so we're not going to just revert the change. I don't think anyone is asking to revert the change. In any case, is it absolutely necessary for us to call wait_for_sigthread() before we do the other initialization in dll_crt0_1() ? ie. can we move it further down? Or perhaps we can reorder the initialization code somewhat such that we can do more work before calling wait_for_sigthread()? Regards, -Edward -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple