Re: svn

[David Rothenberger <daveroth@acm.org>]

On 2/15/2011 3:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> David Rothenberger wrote:
>> On 2/14/2011 12:11 AM, Gary wrote:
> 
>>> If I can replace svn in the sequence with something else, for example
>>> tortoise, and everything then works, then Cygwin/svn *is* the culprit.
>>
>> If the bits are identical, then what else could be breaking your build?
>> Perhaps the permissions on files, as I suggested in the same email you
>> partially quoted above?
> 
> You said:
> 
>> [if bytes identiocal] I can't see how svn could be the culprit.
>>
>> Unless perhaps the permissions on some of the DLLs are different. It
>> might be worth using cacls to inspect the ACLs on some of the DLLs.
> 
> I could't comment on that, because I hadn't had time to try it out. They
> are different - the files checked out with Tortoise correctly (I guess)
> have the various EXECUTE flags set, those with Cygwin's svn do not.

If those files have the svn:executable property set, then it's a bug in
Cygwin's svn. Otherwise, you just need to set that property on the DLLs.
Maybe TortoiseSVN does some special handling for DLLs.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth@acm.org

The Public is merely a multiplied "me."
                -- Mark Twain

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple