From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10731 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2011 16:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 10707 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2011 16:16:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.212) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:16:22 +0000 Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8GFw1g0030QuhwU5EGGM77; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:16:21 +0000 Received: from mail.daveroth.dyndns.org ([24.16.31.212]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8GGJ1g00S4abx5U3NGGLPL; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:16:21 +0000 Received: from [10.249.1.102] (tela.daveroth.dyndns.org [10.249.1.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.daveroth.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p1FGGFM6012622 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:16:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4D5AA6D0.20201@acm.org> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:16:00 -0000 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: svn References: <4D540927.9030000@cs.umass.edu> <83vd0rmzd6.fsf@garydjones.name> <4D54506B.7080702@acm.org> <4D5563A9.60607@acm.org> <4D596749.7000708@acm.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 On 2/15/2011 3:09 AM, Gary wrote: > David Rothenberger wrote: >> On 2/14/2011 12:11 AM, Gary wrote: > >>> If I can replace svn in the sequence with something else, for example >>> tortoise, and everything then works, then Cygwin/svn *is* the culprit. >> >> If the bits are identical, then what else could be breaking your build? >> Perhaps the permissions on files, as I suggested in the same email you >> partially quoted above? > > You said: > >> [if bytes identiocal] I can't see how svn could be the culprit. >> >> Unless perhaps the permissions on some of the DLLs are different. It >> might be worth using cacls to inspect the ACLs on some of the DLLs. > > I could't comment on that, because I hadn't had time to try it out. They > are different - the files checked out with Tortoise correctly (I guess) > have the various EXECUTE flags set, those with Cygwin's svn do not. If those files have the svn:executable property set, then it's a bug in Cygwin's svn. Otherwise, you just need to set that property on the DLLs. Maybe TortoiseSVN does some special handling for DLLs. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth@acm.org The Public is merely a multiplied "me." -- Mark Twain -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple