From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31813 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2011 13:49:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31802 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2011 13:49:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from granite1.mail.cornell.edu (HELO authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu) (128.253.83.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:49:32 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (cpe-67-249-196-94.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.196.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p1LDnRni019083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:49:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4D626D65.3060408@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:49:00 -0000 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Spurious "Connection reset by peer" problems anybody? References: <20110221104352.GA17868@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110221104352.GA17868@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 On 2/21/2011 5:43 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi listies, > > > over the weekend I came across a description of a Windows socket problem > which might affect some of us. Fortunately I also came across the > potential solution. > > My question is, does anybody have a scenario in which he or she > encounters weird "Connection reset by peer" or "Software caused > connection abort" messages in Cygwin, possibly at the end of a > connection attempt? > > If so, I might have a solution for this problem. The code exists, but > personally I don't have any such problem, so I can't test if it helps, > and I'm reluctant to apply this to Cygwin without need. > > Therefore I need a guinea pig for this change. Any takers? I have one situation in which I often get a "Software caused connection abort" message. I'll be glad to test your change. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple