From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17152 invoked by alias); 16 May 2011 02:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 17143 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2011 02:27:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from granite1.mail.cornell.edu (HELO authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu) (128.253.83.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 02:27:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (cpe-67-249-194-47.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.194.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p4G2RQJH010081 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 22:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DD08B8E.6090707@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 02:27:00 -0000 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Using Cygwin Emacs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 On 5/15/2011 9:27 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote: > I first the first time today looked more in depth at the packages > available in Cygwin as I was seaching for gdb to use as my debugger in > emacs. I found emacs in the package list!. > > Found this wiki page > http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki?CygwinizedEmacsHOWTO though its > layout is a little bit confused, it tries to advise on using emacs in > cygwin. That wiki page is way out of date. I would advise you to ignore it. If you install Cygwin's emacs package, you'll find more up-to-date information in /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/emacs.README . > Before I venture down this path are there many people using > this package? Is it advantageous to use this package(cygwin)? Or is > there not much upside to a user using the default 23.2 zip package? There are plenty of Cygwin users who use (Cygwin's) emacs. I don't understand your last two questions. What do you mean by the "default 23.2 zip package"? But if you want to know what it's like to use Cygwin's emacs package instead of whatever you're using now, why not just try it? Ken Brown Cygwin's emacs maintainer -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple