From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6261 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2011 20:33:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 6253 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2011 20:33:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:33:31 +0000 Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FwZ51h0081YDfWL58wZY8j; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:33:32 +0000 Received: from mail.daveroth.dyndns.org ([24.16.31.212]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FwYQ1h03g4abx5U3gwZ1JX; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:33:29 +0000 Received: from [10.249.1.104] (tela64.daveroth.dyndns.org [10.249.1.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.daveroth.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id p73KW0OE010219 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:32:01 -0700 Message-ID: <4E39B056.6020200@acm.org> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:33:00 -0000 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: git-svn hang starting with 20110721 snapshot. References: <4E383AC9.4000406@acm.org> <20110803084427.GA999@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110803134528.GA27354@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110803140013.GA27420@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20110803180231.GA481@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E399617.7020900@acm.org> <20110803190314.GB18612@calimero.vinschen.de> <1312401761.7008.17.camel@YAAKOV04> <20110803201952.GC18612@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110803201952.GC18612@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 On 8/3/2011 1:19 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 3 15:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:03 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Better drop the large address stuff for now. Since the heap is now in >>> the large addres area(*), and since mmaps will go there, too(*), we have >>> basically a lot more free space in the area up to 0x7fffffff. >> >> At this moment, I've got DLLs from 0xf0000000 all the way down to >> 0xa1740000, and I could easily have more if I installed all of KDE >> (which I provide in Ports, but I prefer to use GNOME). So where do you >> suggest I find that kind of open space in the lower half? > > Did you use the current rebaseall? If so you have a 64K hole between > each DLL. Isn't this avoided by passing "-o 0" to the current rebaseall? > Other than that I don't have an answer for you. There's only > so much you can do within the 32 bit address space. That's only one > reason why a 64 bit Cygwin would be a good idea. What was the motivation for putting the heap and mmaps above 0x80000000? Was there not enough space for them below? Would there be enough space below if all the DLLs were above? -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth@acm.org zeal, n.: Quality seen in new graduates -- if you're quick. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple