From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28920 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2011 12:32:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28910 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2011 12:32:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu (HELO mx3.mail.elte.hu) (157.181.1.138) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:32:03 +0000 Received: from mailbox1.caesar.elte.hu ([157.181.151.157]) by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1RNkqO-0007fA-Ml from for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:32:01 +0100 Received: (Authenticated sender: szgyg) by mailbox1.caesar.elte.hu with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RNkqO-0001Z7-AB for cygwin@cygwin.com; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:32:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4EB9213D.9010200@ludens.elte.hu> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:32:00 -0000 From: szgyg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; hu; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 ThunderBrowse/3.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: FAQ 4.2 Why is Cygwin suddenly so slow? (was Re: cygwin very slow under virtual box (productivity hit)) References: <4EB47513.2050105@gmail.com> <4EB86628.8030805@laposte.net> <20111108093218.GA15154@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20111108093218.GA15154@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELTE-SpamScore: -8.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-8.0 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,L_AUTH autolearn=ham SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -5.0 L_AUTH Caesar auth -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On 11/8/2011 10:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 8 00:13, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >> alternative, remove the bash-completion package if any. > > Wouldn't it make more sense to find out what part of the bash-completion > package is the usual culprit and to disable or change this part in a > bash-completion package update? Dynamic loading may help ongoing work upstream: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.completion.devel/3375 see also: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467231 szgyg -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple