From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1042 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2011 13:31:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1021 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2011 13:31:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-dy0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-dy0-f43.google.com) (209.85.220.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:31:05 +0000 Received: by dyf28 with SMTP id 28so32716dyf.2 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.65 with SMTP id fq1mr51483188vdc.27.1321450263466; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.21.193.102] (85-18-126-22.ip.fastwebnet.it. [85.18.126.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k4sm42979695vdu.2.2011.11.16.05.31.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:31:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EC3BB12.6020503@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:31:00 -0000 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: help for diagnose unpedictable "fork errors", "cygheap base msimatch errors" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 On 11/16/2011 1:40 PM, Heiko Elger wrote: > Hello, > > we've still cygwin system errors. > I use snapshot 20111030 and all other colleagues snapshot 20110829. > We've done rebaseall and peflagsall. > We have win7/64 (CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64). > > All errors are unpredictable - so there is really no possible testcase. > I noticed the following problems: > > 1. runing perl: > child_info_fork::abort: address space needed by 'IO.dll' (009D0000) is already > occupied > > 2. running perl > 0 [main] perl 22992 C:\programme\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - cy > gheap base mismatch detected - 0x612527E0/0xF927E0. > This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. > Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility > and delete all but the most recent version. The most recent version *should* > reside in x:\cygwin\bin, where 'x' is the drive on which you have > installed the cygwin distribution. Rebooting is also suggested if you > are unable to find another cygwin DLL. > > --> there is definitely no other currrent cygwin1.dll > > 3. running sh.exe from within make > 0 [main] sh 5564 child_info_fork::abort data segment start: parent(0x682000) ! > = child(0x32000) m.sh fork: retry: Resource temorarily unavailable > > 4. running make > 0 [main] make-3.80 22116 child_info::sync: wait failed, pid 21196, Win32 error > 1892 > > How can I gather more informations about the problems with other cygwin tools. > I'm definitely no cygwin professional. > I already tried strace - I have an strace log of problem 1.) - if this would > be helpful, I can post it. > > OK - I already checked the BLODA - and yes one is running on our system - > Symantec Endpoint Protection Version 12.x. > > We deinstalled it on 3 PCs - perhaps we will see no more error there. > > But cause of unpedictable errors and no testcase it's not a solution to > deinstall it on all machines. > > Is there a testcase for detecting Symantec as the real problem - we are in > contact with Symantec too. > Does anyone know the problem of using Symantec Endpoint Protection a little > bit in details. > Is it possible that the unloading of DLL code is delayed? > > I noticed in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/129594 that there is an > existing error - so I will give the the next snapshot a try. > > @cfg: > Can this http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/129594 the reason for our > problems too? > > Any hints are welcome. > > best regards > > Heiko Elger > Heiko, you wrote a lot of mail , but I do not remember a single Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html As cygwin is working on win7/64, something is wrong on your machine, but until you provide clear data we can not easly help you. I am currently using 2011-11-08 snapshot on win7/64 and it is working fine (2011-11-14 has a problem and I have not yet tested 2011-11-16) Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple