From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12568 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2011 17:23:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12558 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2011 17:23:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f45.google.com) (74.125.82.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:23:41 +0000 Received: by wwf10 with SMTP id 10so4431232wwf.2 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.136.3 with SMTP id v3mr529475wei.39.1321637020414; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i8sm659789wie.11.2011.11.18.09.23.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:23:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EC69486.5080301@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:23:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Rolling back to 1.6.x Subversion References: <4EC2DDF5.9000403@gmail.com> <4EC3D428.5030605@bopp.net> <17010684424.20111117022022@mtu-net.ru> <4EC55B11.8090602@etr-usa.com> <1286468521.20111118024209@mtu-net.ru> <4EC5A338.9060302@etr-usa.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On 18/11/2011 14:24, Csaba Raduly wrote: > On 11/18/11, Warren Young wrote: >> On 11/17/2011 3:42 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: [ one level of attribution lost here ] >>>> $ ls -d .svn >>> 1.7 working copy do not have .svn dirs in nested directories. >>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#wc-ng >> Sorry, I remembered that too late. >> >> How about "svn st -q ."? > > That prints nothing if the folder is up to date. > Did you mean "svn st -u ." ? How about the quicker (because non-recursively-scanning-the-whole-tree) "svn info ."? cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple