public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Johnson <ryan.johnson@cs.utoronto.ca>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Machine very sluggish while compiling
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECF16D4.8010804@cs.utoronto.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECF1452.6080508@chariot.net.au>

On 24/11/2011 11:06 PM, Mike wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> Lately I've noticed that running make -j4 on my quad-core win7-x64 
>> machine causes it to become sluggish or even unresponsive. For 
>> example, compiling a large package makes the mouse jumpy, delays 
>> keystrokes, adds stutter to my music, and makes task switching 
>> painfully slow (though, oddly, if I manage to switch to the mintty 
>> that runs make the machine "comes back"). The sluggishness always 
>> hits when I'm using a native windows app with the compile running in 
>> the background. This starts to sound oddly like the recently-reported 
>> issue where X was causing native windows apps to freeze [1].
>>
>> I'm not seeing any fork failures, and am running BLODA-free (Windows 
>> Defender hasn't reappeared since I last uninstalled it). There's no 
>> unusual disk activity and memory utilization remains stable. I've 
>> tried running with nice, reducing the priority of 'make' from the 
>> task manager, and running make -j3 to no avail, though empirically if 
>> utilization stays at or below 2 cpu then there's no problem. I've 
>> compiled large apps (gcc, binutils, emacs, gdb, ...) off and on for 
>> several years now and never seen this behavior before.
>>
>> Any ideas of how I might diagnose the issue further? It's easy enough 
>> to work around, but compiles take a lot longer with only 1-2 cores 
>> instead of 4.
>
> I've seen problems like this caused by viruses. Process Explorer might 
> give you more detailed info:
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-au/sysinternals/bb896653
I've used Process Explorer several times in the past, but it's not 
immediately obvious to me what I should be using it to look for. 
Suspicious dlls? I keep my machine patched, regularly check my process 
list for suspicious/unfamiliar entries, and have not had a virus in 
roughly 8 years (and that one was thanks to my sister in-law borrowing 
the machine). I can't rule out a rootkit infection, but PE wouldn't be 
any help there anyway.

> Perhaps you are using a different version of bash or other shell? Some 
> versions have been known to bog down the system as you describe.
> Search for  bash slow  might yield some clues:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/
Latest version of cygwin's bash, bash-completions package is not 
installed. Also, make+compilation seems to proceed at normal speed the 
whole time... it's everybody else that suffers.

BTW, thanks for the ideas, they're definitely solid sanity checks.

Regards,
Ryan



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-25  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-25  4:07 Ryan Johnson
2011-11-25  4:17 ` Mike
2011-11-25  7:22   ` Ryan Johnson [this message]
2011-11-25 15:48 ` Spiro Trikaliotis
2011-12-04  7:55   ` Ryan Johnson
2011-12-04 10:07     ` Corinna Vinschen
2011-12-05 22:25       ` Ken Brown
2011-12-06 10:39         ` Corinna Vinschen
2011-12-08 11:18       ` Robert Miles
2011-12-08 13:15         ` Ryan Johnson
2011-12-04 19:29     ` Christopher Faylor
     [not found]       ` <4EDBD5A5.2000707@cs.utoronto.ca>
2011-12-04 20:23         ` Ryan Johnson
2011-12-06 17:39 ` Andrew Schulman
2011-12-07  5:23   ` Mike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ECF16D4.8010804@cs.utoronto.ca \
    --to=ryan.johnson@cs.utoronto.ca \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).