From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28707 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2012 17:58:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 28697 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2012 17:58:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_FC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:24 +0000 Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZsKT1i0051ei1Bg53tyQiN; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:24 +0000 Received: from mail.daveroth.dyndns.org ([24.22.184.108]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZtyP1i00D2LkTg83ktyPQ1; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:24 +0000 Received: from [10.249.1.104] (tela64.daveroth.dyndns.org [10.249.1.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.daveroth.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q1EHwHib027136 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:58:20 -0800 Message-ID: <4F3AA0BB.7000806@acm.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:00 -0000 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure References: <4F3A14A8.4090506@acm.org> <20120214140240.GB25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120214144551.GC25918@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20120214144551.GC25918@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 On 2/14/2012 6:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 14 15:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Feb 14 00:00, David Rothenberger wrote: >>> The libapr1 test cases are failing again for flock locks. This same >>> test case failed with 1.7.9 with a fatal error[1], but that was >>> corrected. The test is no longer encountering the fatal error, but >>> it is producing the wrong result. >> >> Thanks for the testcase. I think I found the issue. An event handle >> was closed in the wrong place, outside of the important mutex lock for >> the lock object. I applied the patch to CVS. Your testcase now appears >> to run fine for me. Can you try your entire testsuite again and see >> if there's another failure lurking? > > I uploaded a snapshot for testing. Thanks. The snapshot fixes the flock test case, but now the fcntl test case is failing. I'll try to send an STC for that case, but I suspect the one from last year will have the problem. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth@acm.org QOTD: "I drive my car quietly, for it goes without saying." -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple