From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15548 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2012 19:39:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 15537 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2012 19:39:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:39:08 +0000 Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aKf71i0071GXsucAAKf72j; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:39:07 +0000 Received: from mail.daveroth.dyndns.org ([24.22.184.108]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aKf61i0042LkTg88UKf6Xn; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:39:07 +0000 Received: from [10.249.1.104] (tela64.daveroth.dyndns.org [10.249.1.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.daveroth.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q1FJd4CK015080 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:39:04 -0800 Message-ID: <4F3C09D9.6000406@acm.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:39:00 -0000 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure References: <4F3A14A8.4090506@acm.org> <20120214140240.GB25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120214144551.GC25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3AA0BB.7000806@acm.org> <20120214182452.GK25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3AD58A.9040106@acm.org> <20120215153851.GQ25918@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20120215153851.GQ25918@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 On 2/15/2012 7:38 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Did I mention that I hate synchronization problems? Anyway, I think I > found the problem. I applied a patch which fixes the problem for me > and, surprise!, the flock test still runs fine, too. I've just uploaded > a new snapshot. Please give it a try. All the procmutex tests pass now! Awesome! But... now one of the flock tests is failing. It takes a while to extract a STC from the APR test suite because everything is written in APR-ese and I have to convert every APR call into the base C library calls. I'll work on that over the next day or three. The gist of the test that's failing is this: * Create a file. * Get an exclusive flock on it. * Spawn a child process that attempts to get an exclusive, non-blocking lock on the file. The test is expecting that the child will not be able to get the lock, but the child is able to. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth@acm.org Hubbard's Law: Don't take life too seriously; you won't get out of it alive. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple