* Attempt to build aplus-fsf-4.22 (EnumTable)
@ 2012-03-19 14:51 Tom Szczesny
2012-03-19 16:01 ` marco atzeri
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Szczesny @ 2012-03-19 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Well, of course, you are correct. It did not work.
It was like a sinkhole.
For each header file that I included in the aplus source,
an additional header file was required.
You asked what definitions were initially required. They are:
FIOCLEX
FIONCLEX
FIOSETOWN
FIOGETOWN
TIOCOUTQ
TIOCSTI
I assume from your question, that I should declare these
variables in the source, rather than bring in the header files
that the source is expecting.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Attempt to build aplus-fsf-4.22 (EnumTable)
2012-03-19 14:51 Attempt to build aplus-fsf-4.22 (EnumTable) Tom Szczesny
@ 2012-03-19 16:01 ` marco atzeri
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marco atzeri @ 2012-03-19 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On 3/19/2012 3:51 PM, Tom Szczesny wrote:
> Well, of course, you are correct. It did not work.
> It was like a sinkhole.
> For each header file that I included in the aplus source,
> an additional header file was required.
>
> You asked what definitions were initially required. They are:
>
> FIOCLEX
> FIONCLEX
> FIOSETOWN
> FIOGETOWN
> TIOCOUTQ
> TIOCSTI
>
> I assume from your question, that I should declare these
> variables in the source, rather than bring in the header files
> that the source is expecting.
>
Tom,
FYI, in the past the xmon maintainer used
this strategy, to overcome the lack of FIOCLEX/FIONCLEX
#if defined(SYSV) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
fcntl(ConnectionSocket, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC);
#else
ioctl(ConnectionSocket, FIOCLEX, 0);
#endif
#if defined(SYSV) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
fcntl(ClientFD, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC);
#else
ioctl(ClientFD, FIOCLEX, 0);
#endif
Regards
Marco
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Attempt to build aplus-fsf-4.22 (EnumTable)
2012-03-18 16:46 Tom Szczesny
@ 2012-03-18 17:50 ` marco atzeri
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marco atzeri @ 2012-03-18 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On 3/18/2012 5:46 PM, Tom Szczesny wrote:
> The current issue that I am facing is with an EnumTable. (see code
> listing below).
> It exists in a file named aplus-fsf-4.22/src/cxsys/eponymous.c
> LEXABUG is not defined in Cygwin. As far as I can tell, it is not
> defined in Gentoo Linux either.
> The code builds OK in Gentoo Linux.
>
> In Cygwin, with LEXABUG not defined, I get:
> error: 'FIOCLEX' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> In Cygwin, with LEXABUG defined, I get:
> error 'FIOCLEX" undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> FIOCLEX is not declared (or mentioned) anywhere else in the source code package.
I suspect that FIOCLEX and FIONCLEX are not defined at all on cygwin.
On BSD they are defined on sys/filio.h as
#define FIOCLEX _IO('f', 1)
#define FIONCLEX _IO('f', 2)
see http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/ident?im=10;i=FIOCLEX
While on Linux they are defined or
#define FIOCLEX _IO('f', 1)
#define FIONCLEX _IO('f', 2)
or
#define FIONCLEX 0x5450
#define FIOCLEX 0x5451
see http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=FIOCLEX
>
> I will continue to research EnumTable structures in C, but I thouht
> someone might have a recommendation.
> listing of code fragment begins here:
>
> #ifndef LEXABUG
> static EnumTable IoctlEnums[] = {
> { FIOCLEX, "FIOCLEX", 0 },
> { FIONCLEX, "FIONCLEX", 0 },
> { FIONREAD, "FIONREAD", 0 },
> { FIONBIO, "FIONBIO", 0 },
> { FIOASYNC, "FIOASYNC", 0 },
> { FIOSETOWN, "FIOSETOWN", 0 },
> { FIOGETOWN, "FIOGETOWN", 0 },
> { TIOCGPGRP, "TIOCGPGRP", 0 },
> { TIOCSPGRP, "TIOCSPGRP", 0 },
> { TIOCOUTQ, "TIOCOUTQ", 0 },
> { TIOCSTI, "TIOCSTI", 0 },
> { TIOCGWINSZ, "TIOCGWINSZ", 0 },
> { TIOCSWINSZ, "TIOCSWINSZ", 0 },
> { TIOCMGET, "TIOCMGET", 0 },
> { TIOCMBIS, "TIOCMBIS", 0 },
> { TIOCMBIC, "TIOCMBIC", 0 },
> { TIOCMSET, "TIOCMSET", 0 },
> { 0, (char *)0, 0 }
> };
> #else
> static EnumTable IoctlEnums[] = {
> { 0, "FIOCLEX", 0 },
> { 0, "FIONCLEX", 0 },
> { 0, "FIONREAD", 0 },
> { 0, "FIONBIO", 0 },
> { 0, "FIOASYNC", 0 },
> { 0, "FIOSETOWN", 0 },
> { 0, "FIOGETOWN", 0 },
> { 0, "TCGETS", 0 },
> { 0, "TCSETS", 0 },
> { 0, "TCSETSW", 0 },
> { 0, "TCSETSF", 0 },
> { 0, "TCXONC", 0 },
> { 0, "TCFLSH", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCSCTTY", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCGPGRP", 0 },
>
> { 0, "TIOCSPGRP", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCOUTQ", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCSTI", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCGWINSZ", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCSWINSZ", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCMGET", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCMBIS", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCMBIC", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCMSET", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCGSOFTCAR", 0 },
> { 0, "TIOCSSOFTCAR", 0 },
> { 0, (char *)0, 0 }
> };
>
> int initIoctlTable(void)
> {
> EnumTable *EnumTablePtr = IoctlEnums;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIOCLEX; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIONCLEX; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIONREAD; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIONBIO; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIOASYNC; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIOSETOWN; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = FIOGETOWN; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TCGETS; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TCSETS; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TCSETSW; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TCSETSF; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TCXONC; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TCFLSH; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSCTTY; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCGPGRP; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSPGRP; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCOUTQ; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSTI; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCGWINSZ; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSWINSZ; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMGET; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMBIS; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMBIC; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMSET; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCGSOFTCAR; EnumTablePtr ++;
> EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSSOFTCAR;
> return 0;
>
> }
> #endif
>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Attempt to build aplus-fsf-4.22 (EnumTable)
@ 2012-03-18 16:46 Tom Szczesny
2012-03-18 17:50 ` marco atzeri
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Szczesny @ 2012-03-18 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
The current issue that I am facing is with an EnumTable. (see code
listing below).
It exists in a file named aplus-fsf-4.22/src/cxsys/eponymous.c
LEXABUG is not defined in Cygwin. As far as I can tell, it is not
defined in Gentoo Linux either.
The code builds OK in Gentoo Linux.
In Cygwin, with LEXABUG not defined, I get:
error: 'FIOCLEX' undeclared here (not in a function)
In Cygwin, with LEXABUG defined, I get:
error 'FIOCLEX" undeclared (first use in this function)
FIOCLEX is not declared (or mentioned) anywhere else in the source code package.
I will continue to research EnumTable structures in C, but I thouht
someone might have a recommendation.
listing of code fragment begins here:
#ifndef LEXABUG
static EnumTable IoctlEnums[] = {
{ FIOCLEX, "FIOCLEX", 0 },
{ FIONCLEX, "FIONCLEX", 0 },
{ FIONREAD, "FIONREAD", 0 },
{ FIONBIO, "FIONBIO", 0 },
{ FIOASYNC, "FIOASYNC", 0 },
{ FIOSETOWN, "FIOSETOWN", 0 },
{ FIOGETOWN, "FIOGETOWN", 0 },
{ TIOCGPGRP, "TIOCGPGRP", 0 },
{ TIOCSPGRP, "TIOCSPGRP", 0 },
{ TIOCOUTQ, "TIOCOUTQ", 0 },
{ TIOCSTI, "TIOCSTI", 0 },
{ TIOCGWINSZ, "TIOCGWINSZ", 0 },
{ TIOCSWINSZ, "TIOCSWINSZ", 0 },
{ TIOCMGET, "TIOCMGET", 0 },
{ TIOCMBIS, "TIOCMBIS", 0 },
{ TIOCMBIC, "TIOCMBIC", 0 },
{ TIOCMSET, "TIOCMSET", 0 },
{ 0, (char *)0, 0 }
};
#else
static EnumTable IoctlEnums[] = {
{ 0, "FIOCLEX", 0 },
{ 0, "FIONCLEX", 0 },
{ 0, "FIONREAD", 0 },
{ 0, "FIONBIO", 0 },
{ 0, "FIOASYNC", 0 },
{ 0, "FIOSETOWN", 0 },
{ 0, "FIOGETOWN", 0 },
{ 0, "TCGETS", 0 },
{ 0, "TCSETS", 0 },
{ 0, "TCSETSW", 0 },
{ 0, "TCSETSF", 0 },
{ 0, "TCXONC", 0 },
{ 0, "TCFLSH", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCSCTTY", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCGPGRP", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCSPGRP", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCOUTQ", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCSTI", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCGWINSZ", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCSWINSZ", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCMGET", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCMBIS", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCMBIC", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCMSET", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCGSOFTCAR", 0 },
{ 0, "TIOCSSOFTCAR", 0 },
{ 0, (char *)0, 0 }
};
int initIoctlTable(void)
{
EnumTable *EnumTablePtr = IoctlEnums;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIOCLEX; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIONCLEX; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIONREAD; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIONBIO; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIOASYNC; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIOSETOWN; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = FIOGETOWN; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TCGETS; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TCSETS; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TCSETSW; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TCSETSF; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TCXONC; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TCFLSH; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSCTTY; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCGPGRP; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSPGRP; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCOUTQ; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSTI; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCGWINSZ; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSWINSZ; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMGET; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMBIS; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMBIC; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCMSET; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCGSOFTCAR; EnumTablePtr ++;
EnumTablePtr->value = TIOCSSOFTCAR;
return 0;
}
#endif
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-19 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-19 14:51 Attempt to build aplus-fsf-4.22 (EnumTable) Tom Szczesny
2012-03-19 16:01 ` marco atzeri
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-18 16:46 Tom Szczesny
2012-03-18 17:50 ` marco atzeri
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).