From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13266 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2012 04:41:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 13258 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2012 04:41:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_CG,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f43.google.com) (209.85.214.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:41:19 +0000 Received: by bkwj5 with SMTP id j5so805412bkw.2 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.128.75 with SMTP id j11mr908987bks.2.1332304877694; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [62.214.139.212] ([62.214.139.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm918467bkb.8.2012.03.20.21.41.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F695BEB.5000107@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:41:00 -0000 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: All clear (was Re: 2012-03-19 snapshot problematic (was Re: cygwin-1.7.10-1 fork - address space needed by ... already in use)) References: <20120305095919.GO18852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120305120230.GA6624@qp9482> <20120305121436.GR18852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120307174749.GB19570@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120308085029.GA9588@qp9482> <20120308095535.GT5159@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120309154829.GA31351@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120316171426.GA20243@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120319205433.GA5571@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120320051051.GA26977@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120320235619.GA16457@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20120320235619.GA16457@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2 On 3/21/2012 12:56 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 01:10:51AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:54:33PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> [snip] >>> Thanks for the cygcheck output. >>> >>> I was never able to duplicate the problem so I rewrote the way this was >>> handled. The error message is completely gone now. >>> >>> With luck you won't see anything like this now. >> >> My change to fix this problem did something bad to process >> syncronization. I have the beginnings of a fix in my sandbox >> but I'm not quite ready to check anything in. >> >> In the meantime, I'd advise against using the 2012-03-19 snapshot. > > The latest snapshot should now be ok. > > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > cgf > unfortunately no dash+rebaseall shows: 0 [waitproc] dash 6868! proc_waiter: error on read of child wait pipe 0x0, Win32 error 6 and the process never complete. $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 MARCOATZERI 1.7.12s(0.260/5/3) 20120320 23:14:21 i686 Cygwin -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple