From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27344 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2012 10:38:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 27270 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2012 10:38:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:37:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 77259 invoked by uid 13447); 15 Jun 2012 10:37:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [172.20.0.42]) ([71.210.206.182]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Jun 2012 10:37:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4FDB1069.9060809@etr-usa.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:38:00 -0000 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.15: svn disk I/O error References: <20120614195507.GA13195@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <201206142200.q5EM0Td3088427@barrierL241.nike.com> In-Reply-To: <201206142200.q5EM0Td3088427@barrierL241.nike.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 On 6/14/2012 4:00 PM, Garrison, Jim (ETW) wrote: >> Why would you think that a disk I/O error was either anti-virus or >> Cygwin related and not... a disk I/O error? Have you looked in your >> event logs for errors? > > It is indeed AV related -- a race between SQLite and AV That's one possibility, but check this out: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11007024/ tl;dr: someone made the problem go away by rolling my recent 3.7.12 release back to the prior 3.7.3 version. I doubt the problem is in the upstream changes between .3 and .12. I'm more worried about the build option changes. SQLite has a lot of Windows-specific code in it, plus some Cygwin-specific code, too. The build changes override some things to force it to believe it's being built for a more generic POSIX type system. It may be both things: the build option changes that force more I/O calls to go through Cygwin instead of direct to the Win32 API could be tickling BLODA bugs. Yet another possibility is that the build option changes cause a subtle ABI change that will be fixed when SVN is rebuilt against it. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple