From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14311 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2012 19:46:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 14303 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2012 19:46:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f43.google.com) (209.85.214.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:46:21 +0000 Received: by bkty5 with SMTP id y5so351931bkt.2 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.121.130 with SMTP id gc2mr5976261bkc.10.1340739979474; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.143.17.212] (vpsurf86.vistec.net. [213.216.12.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ie3sm52070489bkc.1.2012.06.26.12.46.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FEA1187.6080100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:46:00 -0000 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot References: <4FE786DA.2050208@gmail.com> <4FE9A2A1.3040802@cornell.edu> <20120626141028.GB22099@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120626150409.GA23384@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120626153154.GA837@calimero.vinschen.de> <4FEA04B2.9010209@gmail.com> <20120626192357.GB25282@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20120626192357.GB25282@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2 On 6/26/2012 9:23 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> It stresses a bit the computer, but on snapshot 20110619 and later CVS >> the side effect is to crash all mintty sessions on my W7/64 and >> to block cgf's one. > > I'll say it again: I see no difference in behavior with any snapshot or > with the shipping version. They all stress the system and eventually > require me to power cycle it. Is it possible that your cpu has some difference and the probe compiled on my cpu is not effective or causing other problems to your pc. If you want to try, I prepared a slim version of the package at http://matzeri.altervista.org/works/atlas/cgf/ disabling the build and leaving only the configure session cygport atlas-3.9.79-1.cygport compile take 2 minutes on my pc on 20110611 > >> So some of the change between 20110611 and 20110619 are responsable of >> the mintty crash. > > Yes. It's understood that this used to work. No one doubts that. Sorry for repetition > > cgf > Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple