From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123790 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2017 12:43:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 122668 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2017 12:43:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:76251bb, H*MI:sk:76251bb, H*f:sk:76251bb X-HELO: mail-io0-f173.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:43:46 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z13so94505012iof.2 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 05:43:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PWZe3HL8zxuDXa4z93VEeJs29ri7TOh4V6VFcIJPYSs=; b=Mt8lBsucdTWx56ZNs0yU76V1O6EppKAAWm8AyGJl5H1aMAeEpNycljMbv3hfUycmdD JZ8upOpv07rPfGxmUUTliJtXT4JkbaQt+vLfRFF08afIy6CQFI8wbMl49dBktvdjeGLz 50ERovRMSRNpAfTt8jzRf35hR2BPM8XKLhpYZdVGiEWB1az8JnJAbx6ji0NXi7zPzuSh 0nNB9ti9+9386kgekwVUFKP9NeKBeLi0+4PNmOgdr9BvpO1xUuMvqkop/2JTgLrpvijz aAiCgSU5ab5OOV1fArYuIjgiXpVSMeHKA4G4YpqKSEVoY4QGmNVwTXGQo4Ia1ryVjCy4 S7xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0JFDjsgKlx1ZzXbz9U0+uW5ADJnmvZdMN9PX/NPOgx0FY7vEKiZuNbwvdWE/1aBA== X-Received: by 10.107.6.66 with SMTP id 63mr21428723iog.6.1491309826126; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (d27-96-48-76.nap.wideopenwest.com. [96.27.76.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b132sm9083811iob.6.2017.04.04.05.43.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Apr 2017 05:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7e8b44e4-78e9-f9a8-63c1-0979bcecbb87@gmail.com> <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c@gmail.com> <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880@gmail.com> From: cyg Simple Message-ID: <4e5dde61-633a-a8c1-d143-affb537f1e0c@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On 4/3/2017 11:44 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 03/04/2017 17:07, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 4/3/2017 11:00 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> On 03/04/2017 16:53, cyg Simple wrote: >>>> The file is lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz 32 bytes with no contents. I've >>>> tried >>>> two different mirrors. There are also no dependencies applied. >>>> >>>> Reverting back to lapack-3.6.1-1.tar.xz proves that it is empty as well >>>> with the same no dependency rules. >>>> >>> >>> >>> source only. all the contents is in: >>> >>> $ cygcheck -cd |grep lapack >>> liblapack-devel 3.7.0-1 >>> liblapack-doc 3.7.0-1 >>> liblapack0 3.7.0-1 >>> >> >> Then these should be installed dependents of the chosen lapack. Source >> only means nothing when you can choose the binary download. >> > > there are today no packages depending from lapack. > Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require liblapack-devel and liblapack0. > I miss the relevance of your last comment; there are > ~ 473 empty binary package in the distribution. > The installer chooses by default a binary install not a source install. If there are empty binary installations then those also need to change to install the expected binary dependencies. > Please note that lapack is empty but the debug file for the three > binaries is called lapack-debuginfo anyway as the upstream source file > is called lapack. While lapack-debuginfo isn't a requirement for lapack we understand its purpose and should only be installed if chosen specifically. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple