public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
To: Jean Delvare <delvare@ensicaen.ismra.fr>
Cc: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: file descriptors opened as text files
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20010214165225.00a95e40@pop.ma.ultranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SO4.4.05.10102142220300.22033-100000@e3000.ensicaen.ismra.fr>

At 04:37 PM 2/14/01, Jean Delvare wrote:

>> The output of cygcheck -s -r -v would undoubtedly point to the difference.
>> My guess is that you are either opening the file in a mounted file system
>> or the default mode for opening unmounted files is different on the two 
>> systems.  This has nothing to do with Windows.
>
>It must. Let me tell you more.


Fine but it still has nothing to do with Windows.


>I'm writing my program using cygwin on my Windows 98. It works from
>Cygwin's bash on my partition, all binary mounted. It works from Windows
>itself, run from Dos Command Prompt using cygwin1.dll version 1.1.8.

Type "mount" on your system.  What does it show?  Is the file in question
being written under any of these mount points?  Any of them binary?


>I send the executable and the dll to a friend running Windows 98 SE. The
>program fails. Analysing what's wrong. I could see the files were
>considered as text files.


Bingo.  Cygwin treats files as text by default, unless you specify a 
different default.  If you want your program to treat the file as binary,
add the appropriate flags on the appropriate calls.  Whamo!  Your problem
is solved.


>So, the comparison is between binary+dll on Windows 98 and binary+dll on
>Windows 98 SE. Is there somewhere (registry?) where cygwin looks to know
>if a given extension is text or binary ? I just can't figure out why I
>obtain a different behavior depending on Windows' version.


Because you don't.


>By the way, why doesn't Cygwin consider files as binary by default ? It
>would help a lot, isn't it ?


That's an old argument.  If you're interested in it, check the mail 
archives.  Its been argued back and forth there plenty!



Larry Hall                              lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX
                                        


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-14 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-14 13:13 Jean Delvare
2001-02-14 13:22 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)
2001-02-14 13:40   ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-14 13:58     ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc) [this message]
2001-02-14 14:12       ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-14 14:21         ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-14 14:30           ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-14 14:40             ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-14 14:51             ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)
2001-02-14 14:21         ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)
2001-02-14 14:46           ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-14 15:00             ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)
2001-02-14 16:54               ` Ross Smith
2001-02-14 19:28                 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-15  1:36                 ` Jesper Eskilson
2001-02-15  6:39               ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-15  7:54                 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2001-02-15  9:21                   ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-15  9:24                     ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2001-02-15 10:37                     ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-15  7:59                 ` DJ Delorie
2001-02-15  9:12                   ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-15  9:17                     ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2001-02-15  9:28                       ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-15  9:37                         ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2001-02-15 10:38                         ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-15 10:11                     ` Earnie Boyd
2001-02-15  8:04                 ` Earnie Boyd
2001-02-15  9:30                   ` Jean Delvare
2001-02-15  8:04                 ` Corinna Vinschen
2001-02-15 21:11                 ` Lothan
2001-02-14 15:04             ` Christopher Faylor
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-15 15:53 Heribert Dahms
2001-02-15 16:06 ` Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
2001-02-15 18:26   ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-16  8:12 ` Ehud Karni
     [not found] <BF35D9C143BCCC4EB63181B67C9320C804DD0F@serv-075.icon-germa>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.0.2.1.0.20010214165225.00a95e40@pop.ma.ultranet.com \
    --to=lhall@rfk.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=delvare@ensicaen.ismra.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).