From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22368 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 17:02:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 22360 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 17:02:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:02:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6JH2YxX017628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:02:34 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.102] (ovpn-113-102.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.102]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6JH2XIe032437 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:02:34 -0400 Message-ID: <50083DA9.2030104@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:02:00 -0000 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: length in gawk returns wrong value References: <20120719092024.GA31055@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120719113927.GH31055@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120719145544.GL31055@calimero.vinschen.de> <50083976.8020804@hones.org.uk> In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9136DAFDE10B45D05E1B9F62" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 --------------enig9136DAFDE10B45D05E1B9F62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1047 On 07/19/2012 10:53 AM, Aaron Schneider wrote: >> I think you'll find the clue is the ".csh" extension. That syntax is >> for the C-shell, not bash. >> >> -- Cliff >> >=20 > I can't find such csh or cshell on my system, I've searched from > packages and I only see scsh, slsh, posh, mosh, tcsh, zsh, mksh that I Both scsh and tcsh are from the csh family of shells. posh, zsh, mksh, bash, dash, and ksh are from the Bourne family of shells No idea what slsh or mosh are > don't have installed in my system any of them, unless csh comes with the > system. How do I run the csh? Why bother? csh syntax is non-standard, and in my opinion, it is ugly (others around here disagree, or tcsh would have died long ago, but that's a different story - it's mostly people that were on a system that picked csh as its default shell long before standardization picked Bourne over csh syntax). http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/ --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig9136DAFDE10B45D05E1B9F62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 620 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQCD2pAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqNxUH/Rkm6ym+Hnf/wxXHZU/m9xnh ildlQ0ah27HWdtjQs0tpZF9rqds9abgbWw/CcYuW8NYMrJ4G9bqyx1gB8CuVuf03 Do2SBIZHhQ1r0KEyOr/QOLB1fHNd2PwORQAKFXUIGr9V5W6iaaQyar6gn22xlH/p wemSiuqy5AkCodVyXuIV+b4SfYheCi5qyF5+6SlnCl/ZVVoIYvo3tfKjx3Vp3GSp 0F/kjwUQSMqHTKOg5lpCqXwI26QS73d+ZPTUhP5JbluFHXpjATq4eDAe+ANw4hl9 DESHpWn655+emKjE7qPZmXmVxWYYd5RsYLWotcQLCA61srvcKeGyxbYnFmknK8A= =NXY8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9136DAFDE10B45D05E1B9F62--