From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3122 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 20:31:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 3105 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 20:31:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_RX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173017pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:31:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.231] ([unknown] [108.7.54.123]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M7F00IN3CZLG8A0@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for cygwin@cygwin.com; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:31:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <50086E81.9000406@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:31:00 -0000 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cannot Execute urxvt after upgrade References: <5008629D.5090308@redhat.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00420.txt.bz2 On 7/19/2012 4:15 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote: > On 19/07/2012 22:00, K Stahl wrote: >>> urxvt depends on cygperl5_10.dll, which was removed in the upgrade to >>> perl 5.14. Either urxvt needs to be rebuilt, or the old perl 5.10 >>> libraries need to be restored for a bit longer. >> >> Knowing that there are numerous dependencies on the perl upgrade, >> could we get someone to update the urxvt package? >> > > I couldn't find any version of urxvt on cygwin's release mirror, so, no > packages to start from. > Furthermore, for what you are looking for, isn't > rxvt pretty much the same? > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00078.html Pretty much, minus the unicode support and some other niceties mentioned in the message you quoted above. Of course, stepping back to rxvt puts you in the realm of dead code. So if bit-rot is OK with you... ;-) -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple