From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16407 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2012 02:22:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 16331 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2012 02:22:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_CG,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:21:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 20486 invoked by uid 13447); 7 Aug 2012 02:21:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [172.20.0.42]) ([71.210.206.56]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Aug 2012 02:21:43 -0000 Message-ID: <50207BAC.7030306@etr-usa.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:42:00 -0000 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.15: svn disk I/O error References: <50206AE0.90101@etr-usa.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 On 8/6/2012 7:55 PM, Michael Gundlach wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Warren Young wrote: >>> Is the snapshot that cgf is testing going to roll back svn to SQLite >>> 3.7.3? >> >> What reason could there be for a new Cygwin DLL to be accompanied by a new >> version of SQLite? Their maintainerships are entirely decoupled. > > Pardon my ignorance; I'm not familiar with the release process. Well, to a first approximation, it's entirely asynchronous. Every package maintainer releases versions on whatever schedule they wish. There are probably dozens of active Cygwin package maintainers. Occasionally one package depends on a fix in another, so that the release of one will dictate the release schedule of another, but this is not only rare, the condition generally doesn't persist. > fact, I wasn't aware that I could get to subversion -1 or -2 once it > was gone from Cygwin Setup. You have to enter the Cygwin Time Machine to do that: http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/index.html#cygwincirca You can start digging somewhere around 1.7.15-1. > you'll be shipping an update such that Cygwin Setup will > offer a working subversion package out of the box? As soon as I'm done sending this email, I'll send another email (called an RFU) asking one of the Cygwin server admins to copy my new SQLite 3.7.13-1 packages up to the main Cygwin package repository server. About a day after they've done that, those new packages will be on all the mirrors. Some time after *that*, at a future time entirely up to the Subversion packages' maintainer, David Rothenberger, Subversion will be rebuilt against those new SQLite packages. He will do his own RFU, and a day or so later, you'll be able to use setup.exe to upgrade to this new system. Bottom line: it's going to take at least a few days if you want to wait, maybe a week, maybe more. If you have to have a fix today, use the Time Machine. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple