From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8487 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2012 17:32:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 8474 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2012 17:32:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:32:18 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jmbN1j0061uE5Es53tYMlN; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:32:21 +0000 Received: from mail.daveroth.dyndns.org ([24.16.16.7]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jtYT1j00L098amo3ctYUYP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:32:28 +0000 Received: from [10.249.1.104] (tela64.daveroth.dyndns.org [10.249.1.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.daveroth.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q77HWEnY012056 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:32:14 -0700 Message-ID: <50215120.4030207@acm.org> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:56:00 -0000 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.15: svn disk I/O error References: <50206AE0.90101@etr-usa.com> <50207BAC.7030306@etr-usa.com> In-Reply-To: <50207BAC.7030306@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On 8/6/2012 7:21 PM, Warren Young wrote: > Some time after *that*, at a future time entirely up to the Subversion > packages' maintainer, David Rothenberger, Subversion will be rebuilt > against those new SQLite packages. Is that actually necessary? SVN is dynamically linked to SQLite, so a recompile isn't necessary unless the ABI for SQLite changes, right? -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth@acm.org What hath Bob wrought? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple