From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17643 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2012 13:04:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 17630 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2012 13:04:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_SV,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:03:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 11636 invoked by uid 13447); 8 Aug 2012 13:03:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [172.20.0.42]) ([71.210.206.56]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Aug 2012 13:03:44 -0000 Message-ID: <502263A3.6080409@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:14:00 -0000 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.15: svn disk I/O error References: <50206AE0.90101@etr-usa.com> <50207BAC.7030306@etr-usa.com> <50215120.4030207@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <50215120.4030207@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 On 8/7/2012 11:32 AM, David Rothenberger wrote: > On 8/6/2012 7:21 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> Some time after *that*, at a future time entirely up to the Subversion >> packages' maintainer, David Rothenberger, Subversion will be rebuilt >> against those new SQLite packages. > > Is that actually necessary? SVN is dynamically linked to SQLite, so a > recompile isn't necessary unless the ABI for SQLite changes, right? I was just recalling your -3 and -4 packages, rebuilt after my last SQLite release, partly to see if rebuilding would fix the svn+sqlite problems. You are right that that might not have done anything, and that consequently a rebuild won't be necessary or helpful now either. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple