From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11267 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2013 15:39:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11145 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2013 15:39:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,TW_BJ,TW_JC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (HELO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net) (217.70.183.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:39:10 +0000 Received: from mfilter26-d.gandi.net (mfilter26-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.154]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B538D1720E0; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:39:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter26-d.gandi.net (mfilter26-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uAoyrG5J1paq; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.146] (cpe-098-027-058-255.nc.res.rr.com [98.27.58.255]) (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A07117209A; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:39:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <51361198.6080008@dunslane.net> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marco atzeri CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault) References: <50F5D246.6010902@gmail.com> <50F653AB.80102@gmail.com> <20130116123509.GA16991@calimero.vinschen.de> <50F6AD63.8080106@gmail.com> <20130124030145.22fa143f@YAAKOV04> <20130124092746.GC8311@calimero.vinschen.de> <510103AF.3080305@gmail.com> <20130124100037.GB24121@calimero.vinschen.de> <51027B9E.3080104@gmail.com> <20130125150006.GC26731@calimero.vinschen.de> <5102A09A.7040506@gmail.com> <51038B4F.1090903@gmail.com> <51094E62.30000@dunslane.net> <5134FD6A.2000701@dunslane.net> <5135127D.3050607@gmail.com> <51352109.9040300@dunslane.net> <513585A9.70409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <513585A9.70409@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On 03/05/2013 12:42 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > On 3/4/2013 11:32 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> > >> >> >> Incidentally, there is no need to change the test schedules, and such a >> patch would not be accepted. There is an option to restrict the number >> of concurrent connections the regression tests will run (designed >> specifically with Cygwin in mind, in fact, many years ago.) The way to >> do this is: >> >> make MAX_CONNECTIONS=10 check >> > > nice to know. > The test.patch is what I used in last release > > Please note that "prepared_xacts" is freezing the test sequence > so i am forced to skip it , for the time being Yeah. Now that's an interesting thing, which I have also seen. Here's a relevant data point. My Postgresql Buildfarm member brolga , which runs on Cygwin 1.7.7, and builds with gcc 4.3.4, doesn't have this difficulty. So What I'd like to know is what changed between when those things were released and now to make this break. cheers andrew -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple