From: Charles Wilson <cygwin@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: mingw.org cross compiler [Was: problem with cvs binary?]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E5693E.9090207@cwilson.fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130716131044.GJ2712@calimero.vinschen.de>
On 7/16/2013 9:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Are the mingw cross compilers still necessary, now that we have
> modern mingw-w64 toolchains? On Fedora they aren't shipped since
> F17, which already came with mingw-w64 toolchains either.
No, in the sense that you could use the mingw-w64 i686 toolchain to
generate 32bit "native" windows apps instead.
Yes, because the two toolchains are not mutually compatible (different
ABI, different exception model, different threading library, different
w32api/runtime library). If you are using a cygwin $host to develop,
specifically, mingw.org-distribution compatible apps/libs...then you
need the mingw.org cross compiler.
I don't know how many people that represents -- it might just be me and
Earnie -- but I'm not ready to declare mingw(.org)-gcc dead just yet. I
at least want to update our current offering to something more current
than 4.5.x, AND it's necessary on i686 because recent gmp/mpfr/mpc
library updates have broken mingw-gcc. If, after this update, we want
to declare EOL on mingw(.org)-gcc, we could discuss that on cygwin-apps.
--
Chuck
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 6:03 problem with cvs binary? Mark Levedahl
2013-07-16 13:30 ` Charles Wilson
2013-07-16 15:01 ` Corinna Vinschen
2013-07-16 15:52 ` Charles Wilson [this message]
2013-07-16 17:05 ` mingw.org cross compiler [Was: problem with cvs binary?] Earnie Boyd
2013-07-17 1:39 ` Charles Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E5693E.9090207@cwilson.fastmail.fm \
--to=cygwin@cwilson.fastmail.fm \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).