From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7615 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2013 12:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 7605 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2013 12:35:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: konqorde.nl Received: from Unknown (HELO konqorde.nl) (78.47.204.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:35:29 +0000 Received: from p50819e3e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.129.158.62] helo=[192.168.2.108]) by konqorde.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VoBfj-00052s-GR for cygwin@cygwin.com; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:35:19 +0100 Message-ID: <529F2181.7060409@mailme.ath.cx> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:35:00 -0000 From: bartels User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131104 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: C:\cygwin\bin\cyggcc_s-1.dll: Loaded to different address References: <529F0B69.80404@mailme.ath.cx> <529F17F0.3090604@mailme.ath.cx> <529F1EAB.4080508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <529F1EAB.4080508@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 On 12/04/2013 01:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote: Thanks for your reply. > > >> Please note that I understand that the ad-hoc solution is to run rebaseall. >> >> Unfortunately, that is not always possible. > > why ? > Tricky sometime, but possible always. Well, not exactly impossible, but these are production machines that belong to a customer. It is not practical to ask them to kill all processes and run rebaseall when this happens. Not to mention that there should be a tracker process reporting the issue in the first place. > >> >> I am looking for the cause of the problem, so that I know how to prevent >> it. >> Or is the only answer to simply run rebaseall after installation? > > usually yes If that is the case, then why is it not part of the installation? I do not understand why it happens on the one Windows 7 machine and not the other. - - Bartels -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple