From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23026 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2014 16:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23012 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2014 16:13:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173023pub.verizon.net Received: from vms173023pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173023pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:13:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.231] ([unknown] [74.104.179.122]) by vms173023.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MZT00IVE91H3Y70@vms173023.mailsrvcs.net> for cygwin@cygwin.com; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:12:58 -0600 (CST) Message-id: <52DFEE06.4060203@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:13:00 -0000 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygcheck and literal plus sign References: <20140122055830.GB4286@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140122150721.GA6650@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 On 1/22/2014 11:05 AM, David Boyce wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> So I'll change my answer to "I don't know". > > How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'? May I suggest that curious folks can more directly validate workarounds by trying them directly. cygwin.com generally has reasonable turnaround. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple