From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4553 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2014 17:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 4527 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2014 17:15:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ea0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-ea0-f174.google.com) (209.85.215.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:15:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z10so1238793ead.5 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:15:02 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.106.193 with SMTP id m41mr5362477eeg.62.1392225302620; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:15:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.112] (p5B299A2B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.41.154.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j41sm83296725eeg.10.2014.02.12.09.15.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:15:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FBAC0B.8000106@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:20:00 -0000 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com CC: marshallst@appstate.edu Subject: Re: g77 on cygwin64 References: <52FAF082.6020805@appstate.edu> <52FB0686.8080403@gmail.com> <52FB13E2.1070107@appstate.edu> <724410821.20140212111451@mtu-net.ru> <52FB8E3C.3030704@appstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <52FB8E3C.3030704@appstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 On 12/02/2014 16:07, Scott T. Marshall wrote: > Thank-you to those that responded with suggestions involving my fortran > issues. Fixing the code is not something I am going to pursue since the > source code was written by several different colleagues and is spread > out amongst many .f files. My colleagues have no interest in fixing it > since they have g77 on their unix machines, and to them, it isn't > broken. The strange thing is that gfortran does compile the code, but > once compiled, the executables have strange behavior mainly involving > problems reading in data files. So it is not clear to me exactly what > needs to be updated in the code. > I have tried to compile gcc 3.4.6 from source with no luck, but I am not > so good with compiler flags and makefiles. I will give it a go again, > but I am not optimistic. > So, to avoid further mean comments about my course of action being > "stupid", I will sign off. > -Scott > Hi Scott As he wrote "Sorry for my terrible english...", I assume it was not intentional offensive. Coming back to your issue, it is really curious that gfortran compiles the code but behaves wrongly, I was expecting it rejects the code if not in line with latest standard. I saw rejected code with lapack some time ago, and the correction was trivial. But compiling and not working is a serious gfortran bug. Have you a "short test case" ? Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple