From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22815 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2014 23:12:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 22806 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2014 23:12:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: etr-usa.com Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:12:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 57531 invoked by uid 13447); 13 Feb 2014 23:11:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [172.20.0.42]) ([68.35.121.157]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2014 23:11:59 -0000 Message-ID: <52FD513D.2020408@etr-usa.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:31:00 -0000 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin References: <20140213143849.GH2246@calimero.vinschen.de> <952874943.20140213200700@mtu-net.ru> In-Reply-To: <952874943.20140213200700@mtu-net.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 On 2/13/2014 09:07, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Steven Penny! > >> - Do you have any benchmarks available? Or instructions on how we could test the >> speed of the new system? > > In the end of the day, this should affect program startup times. But in home > environment, the difference will be negligible. Whose home are we talking about here? :) In my home, we type commands like ./configure && make && make install That sort of thing may launch and kill hundreds of programs in a short period of time. If we save only 1/20 second (say 0.1 sec down to 0.05) per process launch, we can save tens of seconds on such a command sequence. I look forward to testing this. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple