Re> [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-4.8.2-2 (x86_64)

Re> [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-4.8.2-2 (x86_64)

[Angelo Graziosi]

JonY wrote:
> KNOWN REGRESSIONS:
> The compiler internals are in /usr/libexec rather than in /usr/lib. This
> is a mistake on my part. Expect a fixed rebuild in 2-4 weeks time.

On the mirrors I find tar-balls (still -2) with recent timestamps, 
around Feb. 12, 2014.

Does this mean that the rebuild fixing the "known regressions" has been 
done?

Ciao,
Angelo.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Re> [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-4.8.2-2 (x86_64)

[JonY]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]

On 2/15/2014 01:40, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> JonY wrote:
>> KNOWN REGRESSIONS:
>> The compiler internals are in /usr/libexec rather than in /usr/lib. This
>> is a mistake on my part. Expect a fixed rebuild in 2-4 weeks time.
> 
> On the mirrors I find tar-balls (still -2) with recent timestamps,
> around Feb. 12, 2014.
> 
> Does this mean that the rebuild fixing the "known regressions" has been
> done?
> 

No, I accidentally put up the same tarballs again, not sure what I was
thinking, lost track of the release numbers. Anyway, -3 upload is in
progress.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 834 bytes --]